dejima-ci-hardener/proxmox/README.md

Provisioning a runner VM on Proxmox

The node-side half: the VM, the firewall applied to it, and its snapshots. The in-VM half is docs/building-a-runner.md, the same on any hypervisor.

The whole job

Already have a runner? This page builds one. To bring an existing VM forward, start at Updating — the upgrade notes name the rules to change rather than having you re-read the table below.

Four steps, and the two pages interleave — follow this order rather than either page top to bottom.

	Do this	Where	Roughly
1	Turn the datacenter firewall on	§1 below	one setting
2	Create the VM	§2 below	one form
3	Install Debian	guest §1	the usual
4	Build the rules, apply them, verify	§3 below	the substance of this page
5	Finish the guest setup	guest §2 onward	it sends you back to §4 twice, once per snapshot

Everything except step 4 is short. Step 4 is ten firewall rules entered into a form, three policy settings, and two verification passes. If you have done it before, the rule table is the whole of it.

Two VMs if you are following the tiering — one privileged, one for the confined runners. Every step here is identical for both; the tiers differ only in a flag, and that flag is in the guest runbook.

The rules go on after the OS is installed, not before. The Debian installer takes its address by DHCP whatever you pin it to afterwards, and a lease needs a reply back in. Apply the group first, without the DHCP pair from §3, and the installer has no network at all — which presents as a broken mirror or a dead link rather than as a firewall you switched on ten minutes earlier. Ticking the Firewall checkbox in §2 is safe on its own.

What you are building

A machine to hand to an attacker.

The privileged runner gives job containers the Docker socket, which is root-equivalent on their host. So the working assumption is not if but when: a compromised job has root on this VM.

The firewall goes on the node, not in the guest. Root in the VM can flush any rule set it can see. It cannot reach one applied to its own tap device. Everything dejima-ci-bootstrap installs inside the VM is defence in depth — real against a job that has not escaped its container, worth nothing against one that has.

---

1. Check the datacenter firewall is on

Do this first. A per-VM firewall with the datacenter switch off is read and enforced nowhere, and nothing about that is visible from the VM — it looks exactly like a working setup.

Datacenter → Firewall → Options → Firewall: Yes

If you have to change it, check that nothing else on the node depended on having no firewall. The datacenter default policy is ACCEPT in and out, so turning it on does not by itself filter anything — but it is worth knowing before you flip it rather than after.

---

2. Create the VM

Create VM, and the values that matter:

Tab	Setting	Value
General	Name	oubliette, or whatever you prefer
OS	ISO	Debian netinst, current stable
System	Qemu Agent	✓ — and see the note below, the tick alone does nothing
Disks	Size	64 GB is comfortable for image builds
CPU	Cores	4
Memory		8192 MB
Network	Bridge	your normal bridge
Network	Firewall	✓ — this is the checkbox everything else depends on

The Firewall checkbox is easy to miss and easy to uncheck later without noticing. If it is off, the per-VM rules do not apply to the interface and the VM is simply on your LAN.

Qemu Agent is two halves, and this tick is one of them. It opens a virtio-serial channel on the host side; answering on it takes the qemu-guest-agent package inside the guest, which dejima-ci-bootstrap installs and which tells you if this tick is missing. Leave it on: without the channel the agent has nothing to attach to, the Summary pane shows no address, qm shutdown falls back to hoping ACPI is acted on, and a snapshot of a running VM stays crash-consistent.

What a moving address does not break. Not the firewall. Every rule in the next section keys on a destination, except the SSH rule, which keys on your management address — and Proxmox applies the whole set to this VM's tap device, identified by VMID rather than by IP. Nothing anywhere names this VM by its own address, so a rebuilt VM that comes up on a different one is still fully firewalled.

What it breaks is you finding the machine: ssh <you>@<vm-ip>, and every later visit. That is reason enough to pin it.

---

Now install the OS, then come back

The VM exists and has no operating system. Go to docs/building-a-runner.md §1, install Debian, and return here for §3.

Nothing else from the guest runbook is needed yet. Coming back with a booted VM is what makes the rest of this page checkable rather than assumed.

---

3. The firewall rules

Every runner VM gets the same ten rules, whichever tier it is, so build them once as a security group and apply that group to each. Two VMs with two hand-entered copies is two chances to get the ordering wrong and one of them to drift out of step later.

Both tiers get these, for different reasons

Apply them to the confined tier as well as the privileged one. The rules are identical; what differs is the job they are doing.

On the privileged tier this is the boundary. Its jobs hold the Docker socket and run in the host's network namespace, so root on that VM is the working assumption, and anything installed inside it can be removed by whatever holds root. These rules are on the hypervisor, applied to the tap device, and the guest cannot reach them.

On the confined tier the primary control is inside the VM: the job network, its allowlisting resolver, and the DOCKER-USER rules. Those are real against a job precisely because a job cannot reach them, and they decide job egress by name and by address. The node firewall sits behind that as defence in depth. It changes nothing the allowlist has already decided; it covers the case the allowlist cannot, which is a job that escapes its container and reaches root on the host. At that point what is left is this, and it is doing exactly what it does on the other tier.

So: primary in the guest and defence in depth on the node for confined, nothing in the guest and everything on the node for privileged.

One thing to weigh before applying them to a confined host. Rules 5–9 drop every private destination, including ones a job might legitimately want. If a served repository declares an internal name in .dejima/allowed-domains — a package mirror, an internal registry — the allowlist will resolve it and the node firewall will drop the connection, which reads as the allowlist not working. An internal NTP server is the same story. Give anything in that position its own pinhole above the DROPs, or keep it off the allowlist so the failure is at least honest about where it comes from.

Rule 10 has the same shape and one extra wrinkle: it also drops IPv6 egress to the internet, not only to your network, because the family goes whole. In practice that changes nothing for a confined job, since dejima-ci-firewall rejects IPv6 on the job bridge for the same reason. It could matter to a privileged job that fetches from a v6-only host. If you hit that, the honest fix is a pinhole for that destination rather than dropping the rule, because dropping it reopens the whole LAN.

And one value that has to agree: the resolver in rules 3–4 must be the same address as upstream in /etc/dejima-ci/config, since that is where the confined tier's dnsmasq forwards allowed queries. Point them at different servers and every job fails to resolve while the host itself is fine.

Build the group once

Datacenter → Firewall → Security Group → Create, named dejima-ci-hardener. Then Add these to it, in this order:

#	Direction	Action	Protocol	Dest. port	Source / Dest	Why
1	in	ACCEPT	tcp	22	Source: your management IP	The only way in
2	out	ACCEPT	tcp	443	Dest: forge IP	Fetch jobs, report results
3	out	ACCEPT	udp	53	Dest: nameserver IP	The forge's name is internal
4	out	ACCEPT	tcp	53	Dest: nameserver IP	Same, over TCP
5	out	DROP	—	—	Dest: 10.0.0.0/8
6	out	DROP	—	—	Dest: 172.16.0.0/12
7	out	DROP	—	—	Dest: 192.168.0.0/16	The three that matter
8	out	DROP	—	—	Dest: 169.254.0.0/16	Link-local, incl. metadata services
9	out	DROP	—	—	Dest: 100.64.0.0/10	Carrier-grade NAT, where a tailnet lives
10	out	DROP	—	—	Dest: ::/0	IPv6, the whole family

Rule 9 is for a tailnet. Tailscale numbers its hosts out of 100.64.0.0/10, which is none of the three RFC 1918 ranges, so without this rule a runner on your tailnet reaches every machine you own anywhere — a wider network than the one rules 5 to 7 were drawn around, not a narrower one. Add it whether or not you run Tailscale today: it costs nothing on a VM with no overlay, and the day someone installs one is not a day anyone revisits the firewall.

Rule 10, and why IPv6 is dropped whole

IPv6 has no RFC 1918, so there is no list of private ranges to mirror — the family goes whole instead. Worth having even on a network that routes no IPv6, because every Linux host answers on fe80:: regardless. The argument is in the threat model and again above OUT DROP -dest ::/0 in firewall.fw.template.

dejima-ci-firewall blocks IPv6 too, one layer in, and it is not this. Its rules cover a confined job leaving its bridge. They are not in front of the VM's own traffic, and on the privileged tier not in front of the jobs either, since those run in the host's network namespace. Rule 10 covers root on the VM — the privileged tier's ordinary case, not its worst one.

Do it here, not with disable_ipv6 in the guest, which is a setting root on a machine this page tells you to treat as already lost can put back.

If the console rejects ::/0, enter four rules in rule 10's position instead: fe80::/10, fc00::/7, ff00::/8, 2000::/3.

Two more, if the VM gets its address by DHCP

Skip both if you pinned the address in the guest with dejima-ci-static-ip. Add both if you did not, including when the address is reserved for you on the router: reserved or not, the guest still speaks DHCP.

#	Direction	Action	Protocol	Dest. port	Source / Dest	Why
1a	in	ACCEPT	udp	68	—	Let the lease reply back in
4a	out	ACCEPT	udp	67	—	Let the lease request out

Place 1a with the other inbound rule and 4a above the DROPs, as the numbering suggests. Both name a port and no host, which makes them narrower than an exception naming your DHCP server: they add no reachable host to the list above.

Both or neither. Rule 4a alone gets the request out and the VM still never renews, because the reply arrives from the server's address to the VM's, which is not the tuple the request created. Connection tracking is unlikely to match that against Input Policy: DROP, so 1a is what actually lets the lease complete.

Do not count on rebinding to save you. At T2 the client stops unicasting and broadcasts to 255.255.255.255, which none of the DROPs match, so the request does leave without rule 4a — but the reply still needs 1a. Half a working path renews nothing.

This failure is slow and does not look like a firewall. Nothing breaks at reboot or at first boot. The VM simply stops renewing, and somewhere up to a full lease time later it drops off the network.

Rule 1a lets anything on the segment send to the client port, which is a spoofed-reply surface. It is close to free: DHCP on a LAN is trust-on-first-use for every host on that segment whatever the firewall does, so permitting the reply does not create that exposure. Not using DHCP is still narrower, and dejima-ci-static-ip exists for it.

Then apply it, per VM

A security group carries rules and nothing else. The policies are not part of it, so each VM still needs its own:

VM → Firewall → Options

Firewall	Yes
Input Policy	DROP
Output Policy	ACCEPT

Inbound denies by default; outbound accepts by default and the LAN is denied explicitly by the group. That asymmetry is deliberate: deny-by-default earns its keep where the protected set is enumerable, which the LAN is and the internet is not. The argument against inverting it is above policy_out in firewall.fw.template.

Then VM → Firewall → Add → Security Group, and select dejima-ci-hardener. That single entry is the whole rule set, in the order the group defines, and it is the only firewall rule the VM needs.

Adding another runner later is that one step. The ordering below was got right once, in one place, and cannot drift between hosts.

Order matters within the group, and the console works against you here.

Rules are evaluated top to bottom and the first match wins. Your forge and your resolver are inside the ranges rules 5–8 drop, so if either pinhole ends up below them it is dead and the runner cannot reach the forge or resolve anything.

The console inserts each new rule at the TOP of the list, not the bottom. So entering rules 1 to 10 in the order they are written above leaves you with them in reverse: the six DROPs on top, every pinhole beneath them, and a runner that cannot reach its forge. Following the table without watching the list is enough to produce exactly the failure this section is warning about.

Two ways through it. Drag each rule to the bottom as you add it, which keeps the list matching the table at every step and is the easier one to check. Or enter them in reverse, from 8 up to 1, and let the insertions stack into the right order — quicker, and you are reading the table backwards while doing it, which is its own way to get one wrong.

Either way, read the finished list top to bottom and compare it against the table before you trust it. That is the only step here that catches the mistake, because nothing else will: a dead pinhole looks exactly like a working firewall until something tries to reach the forge.

Rules 2–4 are the entire remaining LAN exposure, and they are why "no LAN access" is not literally true. Both destinations are pinned to one host and one port.

Nothing follows rule 10. The public internet is reached by the default policy.

Values that must agree

Three pairs here are entered in two places each, and each pair is silent when the halves disagree. Read the real value off the machine rather than recalling it — that is the whole of the advice, and every one of these is easy to get wrong from memory.

This	Must equal this	Read the truth from
Rules 3–4's destination	The VM's nameserver	grep nameserver /etc/resolv.conf on the VM
Rule 2's destination	The forge's address	getent hosts <forge-hostname>
Rule 1's source	The host you SSH from	wherever you are sitting

Rules 3–4 want the nameserver, not the gateway. They are the same address on plenty of networks, which is exactly what makes this worth saying: using the gateway works for some people and, for everyone else, blocks DNS while leaving every other check passing. ip route gives you the gateway; /etc/resolv.conf gives you the nameserver, and it is the second one that belongs in these rules.

There is a fourth pair inside the VM, once install.sh has run: the resolver's listen-address and the runner's --dns=. Same shape, same silence. install.sh derives both from one answer for that reason.

Check it, rather than assuming it

Two passes. The first reads configuration, the second tests behaviour, and only the second is proof: a rule that is loaded and a rule that does what you meant are different claims.

Pass one, on the node, with the VM running

Proxmox builds these chains around the tap device, so a stopped VM has none and their absence would tell you nothing.

# what is actually loaded right now
sudo iptables -S | grep "tap<vmid>i0"

# the same, for the other address family. Rule 10 lands here and nowhere else
sudo ip6tables -S | grep "tap<vmid>i0"

# what Proxmox would generate from the current config
sudo pve-firewall compile | grep -B2 -A20 "tap<vmid>i0"

Both tables, not just the first. An IPv6 rule compiles into ip6tables and is absent from iptables -S, which shows rule 10 missing whether it is there or not.

What you are looking for. Chains named tap<vmid>i0-IN and -OUT, holding your rules in the order you added them. The v4 -OUT chain has the three pinhole ACCEPTs, then the five LAN DROPs, then whatever Proxmox appends for the policy. The v6 -OUT chain has rule 10 and no pinholes, since every pinhole names an IPv4 address.

What you see	What it means
No tap<vmid>i0 chains at all	The firewall is not applied to this VM. The NIC's Firewall checkbox, the VM's Firewall option, or the datacenter switch — check all three, in that order
Chains exist but hold none of your rules	The rules are on a different VM id, or were added at datacenter or node level rather than to this VM
A LAN DROP above a pinhole ACCEPT	The ordering trap. The runner will not reach the forge or resolve anything; drag the pinholes above the DROPs
Rules present and correct, DNS still failing	The address in rules 3–4 is not the VM's nameserver. The gateway is the usual wrong answer — see "Values that must agree"
v4 chain right, ip6tables -S empty	Rule 10 was not entered, or the console rejected ::/0 and the error was missed. Nothing about the v4 half will look wrong

pve-firewall status reports the datacenter switch, not these rules.

Pass two, from inside the VM

Three must fail and two must succeed. That is what makes the set diagnostic rather than reassuring.

Nothing needs installing: bash opens TCP connections itself, getent is part of libc, and ping ships with Debian — which matters on a machine you have not finished setting up yet.

try() { timeout 5 bash -c "exec 3<>/dev/tcp/$1/$2" 2>/dev/null \
        && echo "  CONNECTED  $1:$2" || echo "  blocked    $1:$2"; }

gw=$(ip -4 route show default | awk '{print $3; exit}')
dev=$(ip -4 route show default | awk '{for (i=1;i<NF;i++) if ($i=="dev") print $(i+1); exit}')

try "$gw" 443                  # must be blocked - your own first hop
try <forge-ip> 443             # must connect
try deb.debian.org 80          # must connect - the public internet
getent hosts deb.debian.org && echo "  resolved" || echo "  DNS FAILED"

# must find nobody but this VM - rule 10
sudo ping -6 -n -c 2 -W 1 -I "$dev" ff02::1

The last one asks the whole LAN who is there, over IPv6. Any reply from an address that is not this VM's own means rule 10 is not in force, and that the segment is reachable over a family none of the checks above it touch.

This one is a by-hand check and stays one. Everything else this repository verifies, it verifies from inside a job, in test/ci-runner.bats — and a job is the wrong vantage point for this question, because rule 10 is about the VM's own reach and a confined job's traffic is stopped by dejima-ci-firewall before it ever gets to the tap. The sister project checks the equivalent automatically because it has an in-VM audit to hang it on; this one does not, so run it when you build the group and after any change to it.

Both targets are chosen so that naming them writes nothing down. The gateway is already in the routing table and ff02::1 is the same on every network there has ever been, so neither describes your topology to anyone reading a machine this page tells you to treat as already lost. Both are also guaranteed to answer when they are reachable, which an arbitrary host is not.

Read them together, because the pattern says which thing is wrong:

• First one connects → the firewall is not in force at all. Check the Network device's Firewall checkbox and the datacenter switch.
• Second or third fails while the fourth works → a pinhole is below the LAN DROPs. Check the rule order.
• Only the last one finds neighbours → the v4 half is right and rule 10 is missing. This is the failure that looks like success from every other angle, which is why it has its own probe.
• Everything fails → the VM has no working route or DNS at all, which is a networking problem rather than a firewall one. Note that this also makes the first probe's "blocked" meaningless: silence proves nothing when nothing is getting through, so re-read it only once the other three pass.

---

The node side is done. Go back to the guest.

Everything above is what a hypervisor does and a guest cannot. The rest is inside the VM: addressing, packages, the allowlist, the runners.

Continue at docs/building-a-runner.md §2.

That runbook sends you back here twice, to §4 below, once for each snapshot. It says where each falls; this page says how to take them.

---

4. Snapshots and rollback

Three moments, and docs/building-a-runner.md says when each falls. The mechanics are the same for all of them: shut the VM down, then VM → Snapshots → Take Snapshot, with Include RAM unticked, then start it again.

Name	When	What it is for
preflight	after the OS is installed and its network verified, before anything is run on it	a known base to return to while iterating
clean	after the runner registers and the VM has been restarted once, before its first job	the state the rollback cadence returns to

Snapshot with it shut down, unless the guest agent is answering. Proxmox will snapshot a running VM, and without the agent what you get is crash-consistent: the disk as it was at an instant, mid-writes included, recovered by journal replay on the next boot. That is what pulling the plug gives you, and it is a poor thing to restore unattended every week indefinitely.

qemu-guest-agent removes the question — Proxmox asks it to freeze the guest's filesystems for the duration, so a live snapshot is consistent. dejima-ci-bootstrap installs it, and §2's Qemu Agent tick is what gives it a channel to answer on. With both, snapshot the VM where it stands. With either missing, shut it down first.

And clean has an order it depends on, which is easy to get wrong because nothing complains at the time. It must be taken of a state that has already booted successfully at least once since the last change to the machine's network configuration. Rolling back is a cold boot - the disk is restored, the VM is started - so every rollback re-applies whatever is in /etc/network/interfaces and re-runs every unit. If that configuration is wrong, the rollback is when it takes effect, and every rollback after it does the same thing. Restart once and check the machine comes back before taking clean, and the cadence cannot surprise you later.

Leave Include RAM unticked. A snapshot with RAM restores the guest's clock along with everything else, so a VM rolled back to last month believes it is last month: TLS verification fails, apt rejects Release files as not yet valid, and every timestamp a job writes is wrong. Nothing in this VM's memory is worth resuming, and a rollback without RAM is smaller and faster besides.

Roll back from the same tab whenever you want it clean again. The snapshot survives being rolled back to, so clean stays usable indefinitely — qm listsnapshot <vmid> on the node shows it still there afterwards.

Two triggers:

• After anything suspicious. Not optional, and the reason to keep clean current enough that rolling back costs you nothing you mind losing.
• On a cadence. This is what bounds how long a foothold can live without your having noticed it — which is the case the first trigger cannot cover, and the reason the rest of this section exists.

Automate the cadence

The reactive trigger depends on you noticing. The scheduled one does not, which makes it the more valuable of the two — and the one that quietly stops happening after the third week of remembering to do it by hand. Automate it now or accept that it will not happen.

Proxmox schedules backups, not rollbacks, so there is no checkbox for this. It is a cron entry on the node — which is also the only place it can live. Nothing inside the VM can be relied on to revert the VM; that is the same reason the firewall is on the node.

Create /etc/cron.d/dejima-ci-rollback on the node, substituting your VMID:

# Roll the runner VM back to its clean snapshot. Sundays, 04:00.
SHELL=/bin/sh
PATH=/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin
0 4 * * 0 root qm shutdown <vmid> --timeout 180 --forceStop 1 && qm rollback <vmid> clean && qm start <vmid>

Three things in that line are deliberate:

• qm shutdown first, not qm rollback alone. A snapshot without RAM cannot be rolled back into a running VM — Proxmox will not swap the disk out from under a live QEMU — and after the rollback the VM is left stopped, so the qm start is required rather than tidy. --forceStop 1 pulls the plug if the guest has not gone down within the timeout, which is the correct outcome for a machine whose state you are about to discard anyway.
• &&, not ;. If the rollback fails, the VM stays off. That is a CI outage, and it is the right one: the alternative is a VM that keeps taking untrusted-code jobs from a state you had decided to throw away. Fail closed and go look.
• The PATH line. qm lives in /usr/sbin, which is not on cron's default path. Without it the job fails every week with qm: not found.

Pick an hour when nothing is running. A rollback mid-job kills the job, which shows up as a failed run and is re-runnable — annoying, not harmful, but there is no reason to schedule it into the working day.

Check that it is actually running

Belief that this is happening is worth nothing; the whole point is that it happens while you are not watching.

• The node's Tasks pane at the bottom of the web console lists a qmrollback entry after each run. That is the check, and it needs no shell.
• qm listsnapshot <vmid> still shows clean — rollback does not consume it.
• If a run was interrupted the VM can be left locked, and every subsequent run fails on the lock. qm unlock <vmid> clears it.
• A rollback failing with the VM still running means qm shutdown returned before the guest was down. Put a && sleep 30 after it.

Do not do this with a hookscript. qm set --hookscript looks like the right tool and is a trap: the pre-start and post-stop phases already hold the VM's configuration lock, so a rollback from inside one deadlocks against itself and times out. Cron, outside the VM's lifecycle, is the way.

Refresh the baseline every month or two

A rollback reverts everything since the snapshot, including security updates. unattended-upgrades catches up within a day of each boot, so the VM does not stay unpatched — but the baseline it starts from is a week further behind every week, and each rollback reopens whatever has been fixed since, until the timer next runs.

So periodically: let it roll back, let it patch, reboot, confirm the runner is Online, then VM → Snapshots, remove clean and take a fresh one under the same name. That is also the moment to re-run dejima-ci-bootstrap if this repository has moved on. (If a window with no snapshot at all bothers you, name them by date instead and update the cron line — one more thing to keep in step, which is why it is not the default suggestion here.)

Re-running dejima-ci-bootstrap after any rollback is safe — it is idempotent — but should not be necessary, since the snapshot is taken after it ran. On a ci-role host the allowlist is the same story from the other direction: it reverts too, and dejima-ci-allowlist.timer pulls it current again on its own.

Whatever else reverts is cheap: Docker images have to be pulled again, so the first job after a rollback is slower than the rest.

Why there is no script for this page

A script that runs qm create and writes into /etc/pve/firewall/ is exactly the kind of artifact people paste into a root shell without reading, and the blast radius is the whole node — including every VM on it that has nothing to do with CI. The steps above are short enough to follow and specific enough to check, and you can see what you are doing while you do it.

The in-VM half is a script: bin/dejima-ci-bootstrap. Running that blind costs you a VM built to be lost, which is the difference.

One step here is not console work, because it cannot be: Proxmox schedules backups but not rollbacks, so the cadence in §4 is a three-command cron entry, printed in full and explained part by part.